Global politics

Andrea T Edwards

Can we save social media? Should we?

It feels like every time I speak to someone, they tell me they’re stepping away from social media. The reasons? It’s not bringing them joy or connection anymore, so why stay around? They are finding posts kitschy, tedious, egotistical, or downright boring. AI isn’t helping either, because it’s just adding more meaningless content into feeds and people have had enough. It begs the question; can we save social media? Should we? My passion for social media has always been tied to this simple fact – social media was the democratization of information, which meant a handful of rich publishers didn’t own the information airwaves anymore, and we could have our own voice, our own ability to influence and be part of the discourse. But in the last 10 years it’s all gone downhill. It started with us raging at each other, which helped the technology companies work out this is where money could be made, and then traditional media, who didn’t know how to make money anymore in a social world, jumped into clickbait too, as it’s the only way they could work out how to make money. The result? There is no safe place to go anymore, no place for easy access to solid information, and here we are in a giant shit show. When we started raging at each other it was small, but now, negative emotions are the driving force online. No wonder good people are saying enough of that. Perhaps it’s a good thing, an end to the chapter where humanity failed completely? A global ‘Townsquare’ is obviously not in our interest. But is that the correct way to look at it? As we watch it’s death spiral, with algorithms in control, we are left with a machine driving the social discourse, not in our favour. The most ironic bit, with AI now firmly in the mix, the very companies who own social media and drove it into the slop it is today, are also the same companies behind AI – does that alarm you? It alarms me and we are embracing it and them wholeheartedly. Why? We’re not all stupid, are we? We continue to give these men more power and control over our lives, and the very benefit I used to sing from the rafters – the democratization of information – has been completely eradicated, with the Techbros fully in control of our information, and therefore our lives. They have no editorial guardrails they must abide by either, so profit is all that drives them. And we happily go along…. To understand this situation in much more depth, please read this article, Welcome to slop world: how the hostile internet is driving us crazy – it’s bang on! There are a lot of take-aways from this article – “Today’s internet isn’t really designed for us, but rather to elicit certain responses from us, responses which are hostile to human flourishing.” And another: “To be online today means navigating an environment whose design feels adversarial, manipulative; it means wading through toxic slop to get to the thing you want. It’s a recipe for cynicism, discontent and dysfunction, wholly in conflict with the democratising impulses that supposedly drove the internet’s development.” Hint, that’s not a good evolution for us. BTW if you’re not already, follow Carole Cadwalladr – she’s fighting for all of us, but we have to get behind her and support her: Springtime for Hitler – by Carole Cadwalladr. Let’s get serious about AI in this mix Expanding on the AI topic, this article in Fast Company got my attention too – If you use AI to write me that note, don’t expect me to read it. I know a lot of people completely agree with this, but like I’ve been for the last decade – a lonely voice calling on leaders to be social leaders, participating with integrity, as part of the giving economy, serving their audience versus their own egos – I wonder if they feel like anyone is listening now? AI written content feels off. It’s not the em-dashes everyone is talking about (I have friends who actually use them, I don’t, because I’m too lazy to find and insert them, so if they appear, it’s Microsoft editing it in), no for me it’s the rhythm of the content. Two sentences per paragraph, the exact same length, and the same for the next para and the next. I can read it, but it doesn’t transform into information that lands in my brain. It’s the weirdest thing. I like this description when using AI to write your post for LinkedIn, “it’s like a steak transformed into mechanically processed meat.”  Captures it, right? But it’s the bigger story of you write a post with AI help, the person responds to you with AI help, and on it goes… Think of all the energy and water being used to achieve absolutely nothing and who is learning anything here? Who’s using their brains? I deeply believe, if you don’t create something, you don’t know it. Are we all just going to leave the door open to have even less brain power than we have today? It’s bizarre to me. The writer concludes – “the truth, however, is if something isn’t worth you writing it, there’s about no way in hell it’s worth me reading it.” Amen! The problem now is volume! Everyone can achieve so much more, that means even more nonsense on social media, and we were already swamped before AI. Don’t you love how technology makes our lives better? Let’s get onto bot farms! This article: Bot farms invade social media to hijack popular sentiment is also in Fast Company. We are in Bot farm hell, where “you can numb the brain into believing just about anything.” Oh isn’t that excellent news? Bloody hell. This is how it works – “Bot farm amplification is being used to make ideas on social media seem more popular than they really are. A bot farm

Can we save social media? Should we? Read More »

Capitalism at risk

From rising oceans to failing systems: a call for climate courage

I wrote this as a long social media post, but those sorts of posts get lost, so capturing it into a blog and making it look prettier. We are having a break from The Know Show and Climate Courage over the next two weeks, but I wanted to make sure you saw some significant news or thought leadership articles released this week. First is this article by Günther Thallinger, board member of Allianz SE – one of the world’s largest insurance companies – Climate, Risk, Insurance: The Future of Capitalism | LinkedIn. This is worth a read, but here’s a few highlights. “These extreme weather phenomena drive direct physical risks to all categories of human-owned assets—land, houses, roads, power lines, railways, ports, and factories. Heat and water destroy capital. Flooded homes lose value. Overheated cities become uninhabitable. Entire asset classes are degrading in real time, which translates to loss of value, business interruption, and market devaluation on a systemic level. “This is not a one-off market adjustment. This is a systemic risk that threatens the very foundation of the financial sector. If insurance is no longer available, other financial services become unavailable too. A house that cannot be insured cannot be mortgaged. No bank will issue loans for uninsurable property. Credit markets freeze. This is a climate-induced credit crunch. Further down in the blog he says: “At that point, risk cannot be transferred (no insurance), risk cannot be absorbed (no public capacity), and risk cannot be adapted to (physical limits exceeded). That means no more mortgages, no new real estate development, no long-term investment, no financial stability. The financial sector as we know it ceases to function. And with it, capitalism as we know it ceases to be viable.” This is an issue Dr David Ko and Richard Busellato discuss on Climate Courage regularly. It’s critical we understand it and if you’re not following insurance industry and risk experts, this is a good time to start – especially if you have a home, car, investments, pension, or any future ambitions really. The article obviously resonated, and the Guardian picked up the piece here Climate crisis on track to destroy capitalism, warns top insurer. The average person will be 40% poorer in a 4°C world But here’s another article that got my attention this week. Apparently, the average person will be 40% poorer if the world warms by 4°C. Really? The average person will be dead. Honestly, I sometimes wonder how people who understand the economy continue to struggle to see the bigger picture. Everything from here is exponential. Examples of impacts to come I mean just methane released from melting permafrost as heating escalates will be disastrous. And remember methane is 100 times more potent than CO2 in the short term. Or the mountain glaciers. We’ve lost 40% of ice from mountain glaciers in the last two decades (specifically in Europe) and they will be gone well before 2°C, or maybe they’ll struggle on until 2.5°C! Beyond that? Tell ‘em they’re dreaming. When the glacier run-off is gone for people, agriculture, and all living beings in the path of these mighty ice flows, un-liveability follows. That’s billions when looking at the Himalayas. But let’s look at some other examples. According to scientists, we lose 90% of corals at 1.5°C, and 99% at 2°C. We’re already at 1.6°C and it’s well on the way – Great Barrier Reef & Ningaloo Simultaneously Hit With ‘Heartbreaking’ Coral Bleaching. No corals mean life in the oceans collapse, the acidification of the ocean goes into overdrive, the billions who rely on it are dead OR on your doorstep in their millions, if not billions, seeking refuge. Based on how we respond to refugees now, with much smaller numbers on the move, war, savagery and suffering are guaranteed. This is just one piece of the bigger story. Food security crisis On the land, our food is also at risk, which will only escalate. This includes the meat we eat, the agriculture we rely on, coffee, chocolate, beer, etc… that’ll all be long before 4°C of warming. One example getting attention in the news is honeybees are dying at an alarming rate, and beekeepers are experiencing the “worst bee loss in recorded history.” Oh don’t worry, we’ll invent mini-bee robots, that’ll solve it. NO IT WON’T!! If we lose the bees, crop losses accelerate, bigger ecosystem impacts unravel and collapse, extinction, etc, etc, etc Honeybees Are Dying At An Alarming Rate As Beekeepers Experience “Worst Bee Loss In Recorded History” Another real-time example. Queensland has lost nearly 150,000 cows and sheep in the recent floods, which is devastating for the farmers, but equally, anyone who buys or relies on meat from Australia will see prices skyrocket – Experts warn meat prices could rise as QLD flooding wipes out cattle | news.com.au. ‘No warning’ as Queensland flood livestock losses top 144,000 – Sheep Central. But let’s think further than this event and look at the not-to-distant future as heating escalates. Australia experiences summer temperatures too hot for the livestock to survive, and then it gets hit again by floods of the scale seen in the past two weeks (or even higher levels of flooding). We would be looking at 100% mortality for the whole state? How far off is that? You’re going vegan, whether you like it or not Do you think you’ll still be able to enjoy burgers at your favorite fast-food restaurant when events like this hit multiple countries across the world at the same time or in the same year? Going vegan won’t be a choice when we hit that stage of the climate emergency, it will be the only food we have left… Although that also depends on droughts and extreme weather events in crop growing areas, which means massive food shortages are a certainty and it won’t just be in poor countries. It will have a global impact. That is what we must be thinking about – where this all leads us.

From rising oceans to failing systems: a call for climate courage Read More »

Scroll to Top